One can classify animal parenting into two broad categories. I am sure we can argue that there are few variations to these cases, however, they are not the majority if one classify species to species rather than number of living beings in one particular species.
One set are species like bears, various cats, snakes, crocodiles, birds, etc where female animals take complete responsibility of their offspring’s upbringing. In these groups female animals do not even allow the male near the offspring while raising them to a certain age or entirely. They fight to the death to save their offspring from any kind of adversaries. There may be occasional visitations of the male parent, however, these visits are rather brief. Needless to say female counterparts completely own (as in maintain) the children of these species hence their property. A crucial point to understand is such females DO NOT seek resources from male counterparts.
With a different set of animals like lions, humans, dogs, wolves, etc. a close group of their near family relatives are often part of the upbringing. One can say the offspring are dually owned by both the male and female, however, this reasoning falls short after looking at several scenarios.
In current western culture, the rate of population growth slows as the countries develop. Even though women have equal rights, earning more than men in lot of fields, even given preferences in health and education fields, they increasingly choose not to raise children. If they do have children, they have fewer children. Women choose to have children in communities where they can get resources from men either willingly by men or forcibly by the state by filing divorce or special privileges. As such men are wary of marriage because of powerlessness in the advent his kids are taken away from him.
Women are given sole custody of children in cases where men are termed abusive by courts or not involved as much as women parenting traditionally, yet they are still expected to contribute to the cost of raising the child. If men stop paying the child support they can be put in prison. If women wholly own the children, why are they making men pay for child support and casting men as irresponsible if they do not? Now even with women earning as much as men still they are still seeking additional funds from men to raise kids. Why are women not interested in blue collar men who admittedly earn less, but have far more time to be a stay at home dads where men used to do traditionally? Looking at some of the cases by race, in black communities where children are raised largely by single women, the child grows in a financially and emotionally distressed environment and develop mental issues as a result. Another important factor is that these black women receive lot of funds from the state to propagate such behavior. The social and economic conditions of such black communities are terrible because of this reason.
Because of the pro-woman family court bias, men are increasingly avoiding marriage. In many of these situations where men can afford to raise children, they are going after surrogacy to avoid falling into the biased court system. But women are for the most part not opting for surrogacy at all even though they are earning more than enough to afford that path. And note that now, some women are willing to sell their wombs for resources in lot of western cultures. This proves that women only want children to lay a claim to the resources of men.
If you look at the data majority of criminals, upwards of 90%, are raised by single moms, the other non criminal men are either simps or have several confidence issues and emotionally stunted. Also single women raise such their sons as husbands sons meaning they are like resource atms for her at old age. Such women also keep their sons not to marry. At the same time girls raised by single moms are very promiscuous, irresponsible, have daddy issues, etc tend to be in prostitute business, glaringly non feminine just like her mother.
A crucial thing one has to notice is even though men were not involved as much as women in upbringing of children, is that their presence is a major part of the psychological development of the child. This can be seen in similar to that Lion pride. Males take risker roles as such time spent is less compared to females hunting and upbriging. This is very similar to that of humans. However, just because a woman spends most of the time with children doesnt mean she is the rightful owner. In general woman’s approach to the some issue will usually be emotional in nature, so during a child’s development a child sees men try to be rational while women try to be emotional. It is in this emotional nature of women children raised are disconnected from reality.
A man goes through tremendous distress if prevented from doing things at which they are naturally good. As in my other post, men are good at taking risks and are happier doing jobs with that element. In a way women find the most happiness, contrary to modern western culture, in raising children and that’s the reason they gravitate towards careers like nursing, education, health and other social sectors where there are safe jobs. Raising a child is a safe task so society had developed giving the responsibility of child rearing to a women under the supervision of a strong father but, that must not be construed as a title of personal property. For a man his children, wife, wealth and fame are the sum of his resources. Anything taken away from him by force makes him go through tremendous emotional distress and this is the reason why there is a high death rate among men almost 4 to 5 times higher to that of women. Naturally as children are not property of women, then women do not go through as much as distress as men do. However, they go through distress if child raising is taken away from them as they have been doing that as part of biological evolutionary process.
There are exceptionally few cases where women does not seeks resources of a man or state in raising children. Also such women do not blame men for her poor choices. These are really strong women however these cases are very rare.
Summary:
In summary a research conducted by famous feminist author Cassie Jaye it was found out that children raised by both parents with strong leadership of father and children raised by single fathers are much better than children raised by single mothers. Its in this reason many cultures over thousands of years of history did not grant children as women's property because of the destructive affects it has on their society but rather to the father. And whenever the opposite happened which is the current state of affairs society is in the path of collapse.
Comments